Immediate Reaction: Kirby Hocutt's Statement Makes This Worse
Kirby Hocutt wants this to be a story about recovery. The real issue is whether college sports still has a line it won't cross.
After Kirby Hocutt just released his statement regarding Brendan Sorsby, I found myself asking the same question I’ve been asking since Monday.
Why is this hard?
Seriously.
Why is this hard?
I’ve read the statement. I’ve read it again. And somehow I think it makes the situation worse.
Hocutt says he believes “integrity is central to our industry’s success.”
I agree.
That’s exactly why Brendan Sorsby shouldn’t be playing.
This isn’t some complicated NCAA case buried in legal gray area. This isn’t a recruiting violation. This isn’t a paperwork mistake. This is gambling. The line has to be somewhere, and if betting on your own sport while enrolled at the school isn’t the line, then what is?
The entire statement feels like an attempt to move the conversation away from gambling and toward recovery.
Now, before anyone loses their mind, let me be clear. I’m glad Brendan Sorsby got treatment. I’m glad he’s getting help. I’m glad he’s working on recovery. I hope he stays healthy. I hope he lives a great life. I hope he becomes wildly successful.
But none of those things require him to play quarterback at Texas Tech.
Those are two separate conversations.
Hocutt writes that Texas Tech’s role has been “to support his recovery, not to engineer his eligibility.”
Okay.
But Texas Tech is still supporting the outcome. Texas Tech is still planning to put him on the field. Texas Tech is still defending the decision.
At some point, you can’t hide behind the judge, the legal system, or the lawsuit and pretend you’re merely an observer. You’re participating. You’re making a choice.
And that’s what I find so strange about this entire thing.
Why is Texas Tech so willing to absorb this criticism? Why is Kirby Hocutt putting himself out there like this? Is it simply because they desperately needed a quarterback? Is it because they’ve spent a fortune assembling this roster and believe Sorsby gives them the best chance to win?
Or is something bigger happening?
Because right now it almost feels like everyone involved is intentionally pushing this issue to the breaking point. Maybe this becomes the case that finally forces Congress to move faster. Maybe this becomes the example everyone points to when they argue college sports needs a completely different governing structure.
I don’t know.
What I do know is that Hocutt spends a lot of this statement defending Texas Tech’s intentions. But intentions aren’t really the issue. The issue is trust.
If fans start wondering whether games can be compromised, what exactly are we selling? Competition? Or entertainment? Because sports only work when people believe the outcome is legitimate.
And that’s why this shouldn’t be difficult.
You can support Brendan Sorsby. You can get him treatment. You can care about him as a human being. And you can still say he shouldn’t play.
Those ideas are not mutually exclusive.
In fact, that’s the distinction Texas Tech still seems unwilling to make.



On Full Ride, you promoted the idea of "Common Sense". The root problem is there are too many people that are comfortable with making, or attempting to make, the tremendous profit that can be made at the expense of people who don't have common sense instead of using common sense.
FWIW...Grok said another District Judge, say at an opponent's venue, could opine that the NCAA was correct, and de facto block Sorsby as being ineligible ...just sayin'